Re:AT&T to pay $60M over U.S. allegations it lied in 'unlimi...
by Johnny555 on Tuesday November 05, 2019 @09:06PM
(#21459029)
I more mean if any big corp is offering “unlimited,” it’s a good indication of some version of a ripoff / unfair terms of use.
Consumers should stop accepting that as the status quo.
My ISP (Sonic.net) offers "unlimited internet", and they deliver, they have no bandwidth or download caps at all.
https://www.sonic.com/transparency#ii-b
Throttling: Sonic does not engage in any practice that degrades or impairs access to lawful internet traffic based on content, application, service, user, or use of a non-harmful device.
Re:AT&T to pay $60M over U.S. allegations it lied in 'unlimi...
by mlthoughts2018 on Thursday November 07, 2019 @10:25AM
(#21473980)
Your situation seems so exceedingly rare that it is inapplicable for the vast majority.
The added humor in the food truck case is that you can visually see both the extent of the physical supply and the queue of consumers rendering that physical supply incapable of supporting the “unlimited” offer all in one single field of view, leaving you to surmise the only possibility has to do with outrageous food engineering to reduce resource usage and leading to questionable end product (thus undermining the “unlimited” offer’s intended effect to draw customers).