Re:Separating gifted children hasn't led to better achievement
by AnthonyMouse on Monday November 04, 2019 @11:47PM
(#21449694)
Why would it have to be a one-time selection? Put kids in a class based on their current level of academic performance. If you're doing better than the other kids in your class then you go to the more advanced class.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Separating gifted children hasn't led to better achievement
by elyobo on Tuesday November 05, 2019 @07:05AM
(#21451600)
It's a somewhat self fulfilling prophecy though, isn't it? The point of splitting kids out is that it will push them forward academically; by being held back because of their performance at one point, it makes it that much harder to excel further down the line to jump in to an accelerated class.
Re:Separating gifted children hasn't led to better achievement
by ajsnigrutin on Tuesday November 05, 2019 @07:32AM
(#21451781)
Why not take the top 20% (or whatever number) of the lower class, and give them a change to go to a higher class? and the same for the bottom 20% of the higher (who maybe aren't able to keep up) to go to the lower class.
Re:Separating gifted children hasn't led to better achievement
by Spooky23 on Tuesday November 05, 2019 @12:19AM
(#21449857)
Sounds good, but once you’re in the dumb caste you tend to stay.
Re:Separating gifted children hasn't led to better achievement
by AnthonyMouse on Tuesday November 05, 2019 @12:45AM
(#21449978)
It's possible the reason for that is that the original assessment was well-calibrated. But if you want to see more opportunities for misidentified students to prove their worth then why not argue for that instead of making every class the dumb class?