News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Firecracker now supports raspberry pi 4B. Parent comment

Re:Firecracker now supports raspberry pi 4B by lathiat on Monday November 04, 2019 @11:20PM (#21449581)
They already have ARM instances; https://aws.amazon.com/ec2/instance-types/a1/
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Firecracker now supports raspberry pi 4B by Abishek_Muthian on Tuesday November 05, 2019 @12:37AM (#21449937)
Other providers like scaleway has been offering ARM servers for a while now[1].

[1]:https://www.scaleway.com/en/virtual-instances/arm-instances/

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Firecracker now supports raspberry pi 4B by edude03 on Tuesday November 05, 2019 @09:58AM (#21452907)
* arm instances for Lambda workloads. Do you know if you can choose your architecture when deploying a function? I'd be curious to see the performance of node on x86 vs aarch64
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Firecracker now supports raspberry pi 4B by Hamuko on Tuesday November 05, 2019 @12:25AM (#21449891)
Is it just me or are those ARM instances rather expensive compared to other EC2 options?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Firecracker now supports raspberry pi 4B by viraptor on Tuesday November 05, 2019 @02:09AM (#21450333)
It's the price for a not-very-specific vcpu. Your performance could be better on the A family, more than offsetting the price difference. Of you're really considering the choice - you should test your workload on both. Or maybe they save you time in a different way - for example you save time not having to run a virtualised linker after cross-compiling.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Firecracker now supports raspberry pi 4B by Twirrim on Tuesday November 05, 2019 @01:16AM (#21450125)
It's the first generation of the hardware. I'd imagine the costs will start to come down over time as they ramp up the supply chains.
[ Parent | on HN ]