News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Elizabeth Warren’s ‘Medicare for All’ Math by claudeganon on Sunday November 03, 2019 @07:39AM (#21433513)
Matt Bruenig did a good breakdown of the shortcomings of Warren’s plan here:

https://www.peoplespolicyproject.org/2019/11/01/warrens-perp...

As well as the more rational avenues through which Medicare for All could be funded:

https://www.peoplespolicyproject.org/2019/10/30/how-to-appro...

Re:Elizabeth Warren’s ‘Medicare for All’ Math by peterwoerner on Sunday November 03, 2019 @08:01AM (#21433620)
A point which I didn't think of: we are already paying for everyone's healthcare. Doctors and hospitals can't turn anyone away and they aren't losing money. So it's really an accounting problem how do we collect the money which people and businesses are already paying and how to distribute which Medicare already does sufficiently well.
Re:Elizabeth Warren’s ‘Medicare for All’ Math by jfnixon on Sunday November 03, 2019 @08:26AM (#21433727)
That's not quite correct. Hospitals can't turn away patients with life-threatening conditions until they are stable. In practice that means everyone gets triaged. A better system would run public clinics, staffed by PAs and nurse practitioners (with possibly a physician) near the ER, and force the people who have had a cough for two weeks to go to the clinic first. Work everyone near the top of their training, and give hospitals safe harbor for sending non-emergency patients to the clinic first.

That's just one sensible (I think) proposal. We don't need to refinance the current system, we need to completely reengineer it.

Re:Elizabeth Warren’s ‘Medicare for All’ Math by jmartini on Sunday November 03, 2019 @09:45AM (#21434122)
This comment reminds of some of the hospitals in India where up-skilling is becoming commonplace to remain efficient and cost-effective. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2019-03-26/the-world...