Google shareholders say "Go right ahead, be evil."

Re:Google shareholders say "Go right ahead, be evil." by Goladus on Friday May 11, 2007 @04:38PM (#21430)

http://headrush.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/2007/04/06/dumbgroups2.jpg

Sersiouly though, it's a complicated issue and the suggestion to reject the proposal may simply be because it needs revision.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google shareholders say "Go right ahead, be evil." by gibsonf1 on Friday May 11, 2007 @05:41PM (#21455)

If that were the case, why didn't they mention that, in principle, the proposal was good but needed to be revised which is why they recommended voting it down in its current form?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google shareholders say "Go right ahead, be evil." by Goladus on Saturday May 12, 2007 @11:04AM (#21601)

If it were me, it would be to avoid clutter and confusion, as there are only two possible ways to vote.

But that's just a guess.

[ Parent | on HN ]