News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google are removing URLs entirely from search results? by 9HZZRfNlpR on Saturday November 02, 2019 @12:50PM (#21428668)
CIA grants. As conspiracy it sounds, it's perfectly public knowledge and true.
Re:Google are removing URLs entirely from search results? by iKevinShah on Saturday November 02, 2019 @12:59PM (#21428714)
Again, any link even for the conspiracy theory / discussion, as farfetched it seems.
Re:Google are removing URLs entirely from search results? by jacquesm on Saturday November 02, 2019 @01:33PM (#21428903)
It's actually true:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In-Q-Tel

Whether it is significant or not is another matter entirely.

Re:Google are removing URLs entirely from search results? by PNWChris on Saturday November 02, 2019 @02:30PM (#21429211)
That link is cool, I wasn't aware the CIA has a literal VC firm!

Still, I'm skeptical. The link doesn't really say In-Q-Tel influenced Google directly, I especially don't see evidence for influence during Google's early years.

It appears Keyhole (a company G acquired in 2005, who's software became Google Earth) was funded in part by intelligence money. Google went public in 2004, so they were already beholden to public shareholders by the time of that acquisition.

Besides, Keyhole just made good mapping software. DARPA funds lots of robotics labs, but I wouldn't say Berkeley and CMU are any more a part of the US intelligence apparatus than I am as a tax payer. Some work they do has utility to the gov, so the gov funded it. That doesn't make their efforts direct intelligence work.

Re:Google are removing URLs entirely from search results? by jacquesm on Saturday November 02, 2019 @03:51PM (#21429664)
They funded Facebook as well.
Re:Google are removing URLs entirely from search results? by arminiusreturns on Saturday November 02, 2019 @03:20PM (#21429457)
It annoys me how any mention of the In-Q-Tel relationship to certain tech firms is met with derision and downvotes and accusations of crazy conspiracy theory. It's as if NSL's and Prism were just a blip on the radar people want to pretend isn't happening anymore. Snowdens docs though released in 2013 were from 2007! Imagine how much more embedded and pervasive the system is (which probably just got a name change as is standard when programs similar are revealed to the public).

Add in whatever the modern version of Operation Mockingbird is and those companies at the very least are sure to have been infiltrated after the fact. Probably willingly. You'd be surprised how servile people get when men in black suits with 3letter badges show up and say the words "National Security". All these factors and more in aggregate make the probability that there was government influence and involvement highly likely.

For those who want just a primer on this complex subject, here is a decent article: https://medium.com/insurge-intelligence/how-the-cia-made-goo...

Another interesting interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfUm0RxXWxI

Re:Google are removing URLs entirely from search results? by jacquesm on Saturday November 02, 2019 @04:21PM (#21429813)
Stockholm syndrome variation? We're all so dependent on Google it pays off mentally to pretend they must be on our side.