Signal also features multi-device end-to-end encryption.
This non-technical argument feels more and more a shill talking point because the claimed constraint is NEVER provided with technical arguments.
However, it feels intuitive to non-techies: "End-to-end means only one end and I have many devices therefore I have many ends so I can't end-to-end with every end, so better not end-to-end..."
Re:Encrypted web traffic now exceeds 90%
by Darth_Hobo on Saturday November 02, 2019 @04:11AM
(#21426470)
If you can view your old conversation from a fresh installation on a new devices then this automatically implies that some 3rd party has access to your keys. I.e. your conversion cannot be considered truly private.
Re:Encrypted web traffic now exceeds 90%
by tomatocracy on Monday November 04, 2019 @07:55AM
(#21441152)
It can also imply syncing over an end to end encrypted (and verified, using QR codes at setup) channel between the devices being synchronised. I believe this is what signal does, for example.
Re:Encrypted web traffic now exceeds 90%
by tsbertalan on Saturday November 02, 2019 @11:27AM
(#21428198)
No it doesn't. The sync could be device-to-device, or it could be encrypted in it's storage on the intervening server, and require that the user provide secrets on the new device.
Edit/correction: Neither Wire nor Signal sync conversations that have happened before the setup of a new device to the new device.