Re:GitHub tries to quell employee anger over its ICE contract
by opnitro on Thursday October 31, 2019 @11:48PM
(#21416126)
I think you misunderstand me. I don't think those carve outs are a bad thing.
Re:GitHub tries to quell employee anger over its ICE contract
by Frondo on Friday November 01, 2019 @09:50AM
(#21418736)
Sorry, I didn't mean to say that in opposition to you -- it was more of a preemptive explanation of why those came to exist, since on HN there seems to be a lot of opposition to freedom-restraining laws (like compelling business owners to serve members of a historically disadvantaged class), even when there's a (to me) clear social benefit and historical reasoning behind those laws.
Additionally, the freedom argument in the Jim Crow era, "let racist businesses remain racist and eventually they'll be replaced by non-racist businesses" was tried out for a hundred years, and the status quo did not change for people of color. It took the civil rights era and outright banning of discriminatory behavior by businesses for the status quo to change for the better/fairer/more equal. I don't think it would be a good idea to return to that older state of affairs, even if it means business owners must serve people of color, gay people, whatever, because, from my reading of history, that experiment failed.