News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Simple Does Not Mean Ugly by simonklitj on Wednesday October 30, 2019 @09:57AM (#21397761)
What's wrong with it being a download button? Does it have to be a "Cancel" or "Yes" button for the example to apply?

But sure, they're animated. I'm referring to the design of the buttons, not the animations. Try this on for size: https://dribbble.com/shots/5915773-Unlock-calls

I don't get this obsession with Skeumorphism. IMO it's not a good look and should be left in the 2000's.

Re:Simple Does Not Mean Ugly by Angostura on Wednesday October 30, 2019 @10:52AM (#21398377)
The very word 'button' is is a skeuomorphism referring to a physical object. There is nothing wrong with visual cues hinting at a physical button if you are going to call the object a button.
Re:Simple Does Not Mean Ugly by indymike on Wednesday October 30, 2019 @02:12PM (#21400710)
A lot of hate for skeumorphism comes from using ux that resemble or preserve obsolete physical objects. Like floppy disks, corded desk phones, flip phones or analog clocks.

Buttons are great. We still press lots of them every day.

Re:Simple Does Not Mean Ugly by neogodless on Wednesday October 30, 2019 @01:50PM (#21400470)
Personally, I find that animated buttons scream "ads" to me. And animated "download" buttons scream "malware ads"!
Re:Simple Does Not Mean Ugly by fortydegrees on Wednesday October 30, 2019 @10:57AM (#21398424)
Buttons are for pressing, not for displaying information.