Re:Simple Does Not Mean Ugly
by patentatt on Wednesday October 30, 2019 @09:53AM
(#21397720)
I’m no designer, and I have lots of love for Craigslist, but ... does it qualify as ‘not an eyesore?’
[ Parent
| on HN ]
It's a thing of beauty. Simple, functional, information dense, logical layout. I don't use craigslist, but pulling it up, it is immediately obvious what needs to be done and how to do it.
Hero images are eyesores.
Re:Simple Does Not Mean Ugly
by thrower123 on Wednesday October 30, 2019 @10:21AM
(#21398037)
It's a thing of pure, unadulterated beauty in this day and age.
No. It's certainly an eye sore.
Re:Simple Does Not Mean Ugly
by RandomGuyDTB on Wednesday October 30, 2019 @10:21AM
(#21398039)
Is it?
I've never had any problem using Craig's List and it just works. There are no hamburgers, no material design, the dropdowns look like dropdowns, and the links look like links. I love Craig's List! It's one of the only shopping/marketplace websites I don't dislike.
My philosophy is that if you want it to have fancy CSS and skeuomorphic buttons, use a CSS extension and make your own CSS for it. Even better - use a browser that lets you edit a page's CSS in WYSIWYG (if there are any).
If Craig's List was suddenly revamped and looked like Amazon or Newegg, I would no longer use it.
Re:Simple Does Not Mean Ugly
by robofanatic on Wednesday October 30, 2019 @10:26AM
(#21398091)
agreed it is eyesore.
but, it is lightweight it is responsive and it works