News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Simple Does Not Mean Ugly by patentatt on Wednesday October 30, 2019 @09:53AM (#21397720)
I’m no designer, and I have lots of love for Craigslist, but ... does it qualify as ‘not an eyesore?’
Re:Simple Does Not Mean Ugly by torgoguys on Wednesday October 30, 2019 @11:04AM (#21398502)
It's a thing of beauty. Simple, functional, information dense, logical layout. I don't use craigslist, but pulling it up, it is immediately obvious what needs to be done and how to do it.

Hero images are eyesores.

Re:Simple Does Not Mean Ugly by thrower123 on Wednesday October 30, 2019 @10:21AM (#21398037)
It's a thing of pure, unadulterated beauty in this day and age.
Re:Simple Does Not Mean Ugly by x3haloed on Wednesday October 30, 2019 @09:58AM (#21397773)
No. It's certainly an eye sore.
Re:Simple Does Not Mean Ugly by RandomGuyDTB on Wednesday October 30, 2019 @10:21AM (#21398039)
Is it?

I've never had any problem using Craig's List and it just works. There are no hamburgers, no material design, the dropdowns look like dropdowns, and the links look like links. I love Craig's List! It's one of the only shopping/marketplace websites I don't dislike.

My philosophy is that if you want it to have fancy CSS and skeuomorphic buttons, use a CSS extension and make your own CSS for it. Even better - use a browser that lets you edit a page's CSS in WYSIWYG (if there are any).

If Craig's List was suddenly revamped and looked like Amazon or Newegg, I would no longer use it.

Re:Simple Does Not Mean Ugly by robofanatic on Wednesday October 30, 2019 @10:26AM (#21398091)
agreed it is eyesore.

but, it is lightweight it is responsive and it works