Re:Instagram now forces people to sign in to view public pro...
by byuu on Tuesday October 29, 2019 @07:37PM
(#21393246)
I was curious too and looked into it.
Someone originally thought it would be a good idea to ignore EXIF data, and by the time someone else cared enough to address it, they were worried about breaking sites that had bad rotation EXIF data if browsers suddenly started honoring it.
Mozilla tried to add image-orientation: from-image CSS for this purpose, so sites could say "no actually the EXIF data really is good", but then no other browser vendor followed along.
So as usual, everything in computer science is just terrible for the sake of legacy compatibility with the first implementations ever made.
Someone originally thought it would be a good idea to ignore EXIF data, and by the time someone else cared enough to address it, they were worried about breaking sites that had bad rotation EXIF data if browsers suddenly started honoring it.
Mozilla tried to add image-orientation: from-image CSS for this purpose, so sites could say "no actually the EXIF data really is good", but then no other browser vendor followed along.
So as usual, everything in computer science is just terrible for the sake of legacy compatibility with the first implementations ever made.