News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Sad Saga of Purism and the Librem 5 by zozbot234 on Sunday October 27, 2019 @05:19PM (#21372480)
> Unfortunately these phones are incredibly under powered, they come from a time when arguments for bizarre custom OSes like Android actually still made some sense

Not much, IMO. As far as compute goes, those old phones were approximately as powerful as a Raspberry Pi 1 board, with plenty of RAM as well (512MB at a bare minimum). And a conventional Linux OS can run just fine on those specs, of course.

(GPU acceleration is actually more important to have, because you can't have a modern mobile UX without it. Even Purism is very possibly going to have issues on that front, BTW. GNOME-Mobile/Phosh is a nice prototype effort, but I do not regard it as genuinely usable just yet.)

Re:The Sad Saga of Purism and the Librem 5 by kryptiskt on Sunday October 27, 2019 @07:52PM (#21373252)
There were plenty of Android phones with less than 512MB memory in the beginning. Xperia X10 Mini had 256MB to take one I owned. And that was not because it was a complete freak, the full size X10 had 384MB.

I seem to remember a few phones with 128 meg, but looking at a few at GSM Arena they all have 192MB or more. I have my old Android dev phone (upgraded all the way to Cupcake!), and that has 192MB RAM. I wonder if that still starts.

Re:The Sad Saga of Purism and the Librem 5 by swiley on Monday October 28, 2019 @06:32AM (#21375730)
Sure you can run a Linux based OS in 64-128MB of ram.

The problem is that a lot of apps start misbehaving. Firefox and Libreoffice come to mind. Firefox is really impossible to replace too (IMO) I haven’t been able to log in to gmail from a gtk WebKit browser in years and medium doesn’t even work in them (it of course works in elinks.) You can run Firefox in <1GB of ram but it won’t be nice and it won’t run long.

I absolutely disagree with you about the GPU. As long as you’re not running gnome software graphics are plenty fast.