Re:Scientists discover fractal patterns in a quantum material
by buyingarmor on Saturday October 26, 2019 @05:21PM
(#21366302)
Everything is a fractal, even socially
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Scientists discover fractal patterns in a quantum material
by coldtea on Saturday October 26, 2019 @06:08PM
(#21366553)
Well, a sine wave is not a fractal, for one...
Re:Scientists discover fractal patterns in a quantum material
by Scene_Cast2 on Saturday October 26, 2019 @07:57PM
(#21367077)
Random interesting (to me) tangent - couldn't you find a recursive function that, at its limit, was a sine? Could any function be generated this way? And throw some variant of Kolmogorov complexity metric on this class of function-generating fractals and this becomes a neat mathematical area.
Re:Scientists discover fractal patterns in a quantum material
by excessive on Saturday October 26, 2019 @09:39PM
(#21367406)
Here is one in Python. Uncomment the if statement if you want it to terminate.
def sin(x):
def recur(x, n, s, p, f):
#if n > 9: return s;
return recur(x, n + 2, s + p/f, -p*x*x, f*(n + 1)*(n + 2))
return recur(x, 1, 0, x, 1)
Of course maybe it's cheating from your intent because it's really just implementing the Taylor series, and it has too many arguments. I believe any analytic function could be defined this way if you can figure out the pattern for its derivatives.
Re:Scientists discover fractal patterns in a quantum material
by perl4ever on Sunday October 27, 2019 @12:13AM
(#21367845)
Function sine(x As Double, Optional term, Optional p = 1#) As Double
If IsMissing(term) Then
term = x
End If
If term <> 0 Then
sine = term + sine(x, -term * x / (p + 1) * x / (p + 2), p + 2)
End If
End Function
Edit:
This is my interpretation of the Taylor series approximation, but it's probably a bad idea to use this for anything that matters. One reason is that it doesn't reduce large angles, and another is that people who know what they're doing prefer to use some other formula, from a cursory Googling...though I'm not sure why.