Re:Hitman hires hitman who hires hitman who hires hitman who...
by zhangeru on Saturday October 26, 2019 @04:26AM
(#21362501)
I guess the difference here is that none of them actually attempted it, maybe it was a conspiracy charge.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Hitman hires hitman who hires hitman who hires hitman who...
by einpoklum on Saturday October 26, 2019 @05:05AM
(#21362632)
Whaddaya mean, none of them attempted it? Four of them hired a hitman to do it! That's not attempted murder for you? :-O
Re:Hitman hires hitman who hires hitman who hires hitman who...
by chousuke on Saturday October 26, 2019 @05:18AM
(#21362671)
I think that would still count as just conspiracy to commit murder. Not a good thing to do by any means, but not everyone follows through on their plans, so it's a lesser crime.
An attempt likely requires an actual failed attack against the target. It's much more severe.
EDIT: On second thought, I can see how you could consider hiring a hitman as an attempted attack, since once you have agreed upon the hit, the "weapon" has in effect been "fired".
Re:Hitman hires hitman who hires hitman who hires hitman who...
by quickthrower2 on Saturday October 26, 2019 @05:23AM
(#21362690)
Based on watching Law and Order back in the day they seem to portray hiring a hitman as first degree murder in NY at least.
Re:Hitman hires hitman who hires hitman who hires hitman who...
by einpoklum on Saturday October 26, 2019 @05:47AM
(#21362783)
_Attempted_. Just like shooting a guy and missing is attempted murder, not murder.
Re:Hitman hires hitman who hires hitman who hires hitman who...
by quickthrower2 on Saturday October 26, 2019 @05:22AM
(#21362685)
Intent. Hiring a hitman is like pulling the trigger.