- WhatsApp (sees the most use by far)
- Facebook messenger (almost completely phased out, used for maybe one or two people and to regain contact when a phone/number is lost or changed)
- SMS (one or two people, some spam advertising I never get around to unsubscribing to, and number verifications from signups)
- Gmail, Outlook, Protonmail (mix of work and personal emails)
- Telegram (one or two people)
- Skype (mostly work contacts, but some personal)
Also an honourable mention to Instagram, which doesn't live in that folder but does house a few of my conversations with people.
I don't have any trouble associating a person with an app or apps, and occasionally will have different conversation "threads" running with the same person in two different mediums.
The only real difficulty, in that case, has been when I've needed to remember where something in particular was mentioned.
Those are mostly run by immoral companies that feed of your privacy.
One is bad enough, and none works for all. Except for sms.
It is not a hard choice to make.
But I regularly talk to people from, at a quick count and including the EU as one because of the telecom rules, around 4 different countries. My circle of friends and colleagues travel frequently, as do I, and I don't want to have to think about where they are or I am before sending a message.
SMS is entirely inadequate for my usecase. It would cost me a fortune.
For others the choice of sms is not surprising at all.
How can you think it is reasonable to expect someone to sign up for an service just for you?
How do people find it acceptable to use more than one-two messaging services?