News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:New Hampshire Lawmaker Kills Repair Bill Because 'Cellpho... by koboll on Friday October 25, 2019 @12:31PM (#21356617)
I'm struggling to imagine how you think leaving out "in the near future" changes the meaning of that sentence in any way.

Did I miss the part where he predicted a price crash in the smartphone industry? If not, what are you talking about?

Re:New Hampshire Lawmaker Kills Repair Bill Because 'Cellpho... by zebrafish on Friday October 25, 2019 @12:36PM (#21356673)
Furthermore, Apple's entire business plan goes out the door if this does indeed take place.
Re:New Hampshire Lawmaker Kills Repair Bill Because 'Cellpho... by perspective1 on Friday October 25, 2019 @01:13PM (#21357057)
> I'm struggling to imagine how you think leaving out "in the near future" changes the meaning of that sentence in any way.

You're really struggling to understand how a prediction about the future is different than the state of affairs today?

Re:New Hampshire Lawmaker Kills Repair Bill Because 'Cellpho... by koboll on Friday October 25, 2019 @01:17PM (#21357113)
Unless you can identify specific things that he thinks will be changing in the future, yes. It sure doesn't seem like smartphones are becoming any less valuable or more expendable.
Re:New Hampshire Lawmaker Kills Repair Bill Because 'Cellpho... by perspective1 on Friday October 25, 2019 @01:31PM (#21357256)
Obviously that's not possible because Vice doesn't give any context. Your line of thinking has me worried-- finding context shouldn't be left as an exercise to the reader.
Re:New Hampshire Lawmaker Kills Repair Bill Because 'Cellpho... by monktastic1 on Friday October 25, 2019 @01:18PM (#21357131)
One reading would be "cell phones should be considered fundamentally throwaway items" vs "for the foreseeable future, people will consider them throwaway."