Google T5 scores 88.9 on SuperGLUE Benchmark, approaching human baseline

Re:Google T5 scores 88.9 on SuperGLUE Benchmark, approaching... by Someone on Friday October 25, 2019 @03:21AM (#21352669)

Aircraft typically get captured on the ground, or get forced to land by threat of being shot down. “Landed”, for me, would require the enemy to actively land the plane, just as “landing a fish” requires both the fisherman’s action and moving the fish from water to land.

I also wouldn’t use “landed” for destroying an enemy plane (neither by shooting it down nor by destroying it on the ground)

That, realistically, leaves hacking the plane’s electronics and then directing it to one’s own airfield.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google T5 scores 88.9 on SuperGLUE Benchmark, approaching... by andrewla on Friday October 25, 2019 @03:33PM (#21358451)

Yes -- if the sentence had been "grounded the aircraft", then the meaning is obvious. But even though "land" is a synonym for "ground" I don't think there's an equivalence of meaning here. I'm struggling to find a sense in which "landing and enemy aircraft" is a meaningful concept short of jumping out of one plane to land on another one, removing the pilot, and landing the plane, which is a bit much for the single word "landed" to carry.

[ Parent | on HN ]