News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ring Gave Police Stats About Users Who Said No to Law Enf... by catalogia on Thursday October 24, 2019 @08:05PM (#21350444)
A sheriff or police chief approving CCW permits does not necessarily mean that person personally approves of private firearm ownership. It may be the case that the sheriff is putting aside their personal beliefs when on the job. Their willingness to do so might reflect the nature of small town politics (particularly in the cases of sheriffs, who are elected, but also in the case of police chiefs who are nominated by somebody who is in turn elected.)

The phrase "I don't approve of what you're doing but I'll defend your right to do it" comes to mind.

Re:Ring Gave Police Stats About Users Who Said No to Law Enf... by Rebelgecko on Thursday October 24, 2019 @08:21PM (#21350529)
That's true. The sheriff is setting the general guidelines for the process. However from what I've seen there's ample opportunity for an individual officer to impact the outcome of an application. The sheriff's deputies are the ones performing interviews and making determinations regarding someone's "good cause", "moral character", etc. I think pretty much any bureaucracy gives individual bureaucrats ample opportunity to let their own personal beliefs influence their decision making.

Things like the push for 2A Sanctuary Cities may be pandering, but I think it wouldn't be happening if the cops in question were strongly against civilian ownership of firearms.