Re:Ring Gave Police Stats About Users Who Said No to Law Enf...
by scarejunba on Thursday October 24, 2019 @06:48PM
(#21349981)
Lots of HNers here claiming the problem is worth solving and easy to solve. Yet none with a product, profitable or otherwise. Interesting combination of circumstances.
Re:Ring Gave Police Stats About Users Who Said No to Law Enf...
by nullc on Friday October 25, 2019 @05:30AM
(#21353252)
The popular "product" in this space is a cloud based offering with a monthly service cost and a side income based on selling analysis of customer data...
It has good margins and could afford to market heavily and invest in feature development vs anything else. As a result an alternative might well be great for users, great for the world, and also an unsuccessful business.
Doubly so because it's essentially already solved. Setup a standard NVR and portmap it. The marginal gains are just in making it more secure (few care, obviously, or ring wouldn't exit) or a little easier to configure.
Re:Ring Gave Police Stats About Users Who Said No to Law Enf...
by JohnFen on Friday October 25, 2019 @11:51AM
(#21356179)
> Yet none with a product, profitable or otherwise.
I'm not sure how meaningful that actually is. I know that it's reasonably easy because I've done it a number of times, but I have zero interest in making a productized solution.
Re:Ring Gave Police Stats About Users Who Said No to Law Enf...
by wtfisthis1 on Thursday October 24, 2019 @05:56PM
(#21349608)
lol yeah ok go tell the ppl who can barely turn their computers on how to set that up and let me know the results
Re:Ring Gave Police Stats About Users Who Said No to Law Enf...
by JohnFen on Thursday October 24, 2019 @06:29PM
(#21349863)
I would argue that people who have that low of a level of computer knowledge shouldn't be using IoT anything in the first place -- it's too dangerous for inexperienced people to use.
No, it really isn't difficult without the cloud. All the cloud does is make it a bit more convenient.