Re:Ring Gave Police Stats About Users Who Said No to Law Enf...
by CWuestefeld on Thursday October 24, 2019 @03:54PM
(#21348534)
That's mostly intentional. I think it's fair that someone demonstrating ignorance of such a fundamental concept as the difference between auto and semi-auto firearms should have their thoughts on firearms discounted to at least some degree.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Ring Gave Police Stats About Users Who Said No to Law Enf...
by anigbrowl on Thursday October 24, 2019 @08:37PM
(#21350638)
There are better ways to be a gun nerd than jumping all over someone who may have just omitted a word.
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
Re:Ring Gave Police Stats About Users Who Said No to Law Enf...
by CompanionCuuube on Thursday October 24, 2019 @11:54PM
(#21351717)
No, they didn't just omit the word. They actually don't know the difference:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21348242 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21348730
This is not someone who is informed about the topic.
Re:Ring Gave Police Stats About Users Who Said No to Law Enf...
by anigbrowl on Friday October 25, 2019 @04:29PM
(#21358938)
I don't care. The cure that is to offer a correction, not try to detail the conversation with personal attacks.
Re:Ring Gave Police Stats About Users Who Said No to Law Enf...
by CompanionCuuube on Monday October 28, 2019 @12:37PM
(#21378529)
Correction was provided: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21349164
It had no effect.
Re:Ring Gave Police Stats About Users Who Said No to Law Enf...
by scarface74 on Thursday October 24, 2019 @05:57PM
(#21349612)
Well, seeing that I never said anything about banning them and just compared the “scare tactics”.....