News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:DB-19: Resurrecting an Obsolete Connector (2016) by sheinsheish on Thursday October 24, 2019 @10:11AM (#21344838)
The Mackie Onyx 1640 https://intranet.bloomu.edu/documents/tech/ims/Manuals/Macki... has two DB25 connectors.
Re:DB-19: Resurrecting an Obsolete Connector (2016) by jacobush on Thursday October 24, 2019 @10:38AM (#21345082)
But DB25 is still very standard, thanks to all kinds of legacy serial communications hardware still in use. Those used mainly DB-9 and DB-25 connectors.
Re:DB-19: Resurrecting an Obsolete Connector (2016) by cjensen on Thursday October 24, 2019 @04:36PM (#21348877)
Yep, that's the TASCAM [1] audio connector which is DB-25 and super common in the audio world. Traditional audio uses AES [2] using either XLR or BNC connectors and only carries two audio channels. The TASCAM cable carries far more channels and, if using digital AES, there is no downside since it either works or doesn't.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tascam_Digital_Interface [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AES3

Re:DB-19: Resurrecting an Obsolete Connector (2016) by scarecrowbob on Thursday October 24, 2019 @11:41AM (#21345736)
Indeed, DB25 is all over pro audio still. It's mechanically fragile compared to elco (or whatever other multipin) or just using a lot of XLR... but it's easy to get off-the-rack or custom DB25 audio cabling.
Re:DB-19: Resurrecting an Obsolete Connector (2016) by C1sc0cat on Thursday October 24, 2019 @12:24PM (#21346158)
Well if you use proper old school Metal Shells, shrink wrap the connections and screw them down DB25 can be robust.
Re:DB-19: Resurrecting an Obsolete Connector (2016) by dfox on Thursday October 24, 2019 @12:34PM (#21346249)
DSubs are robust when they are connected, but fragile in applications that require frequent reconnections.
Re:DB-19: Resurrecting an Obsolete Connector (2016) by blattimwind on Thursday October 24, 2019 @02:30PM (#21347652)
There are vast quality differences in D-Sub connectors. Industrial-spec ones are quite durable, although of course they still have the robustness issue of relatively thin pins that can be bent or broken easily by whacking the connector on the edge of a table or something like that. That doesn't tend to happen with e.g. XLR, Speakon, Hartings or Multipin connectors. However, the pin density of these is also quite a bit lower...
Re:DB-19: Resurrecting an Obsolete Connector (2016) by dfox on Thursday October 24, 2019 @06:25PM (#21349826)
In my experience the higher-spec DSubs are actually more prone to broken pins. The connector is actually meant as cable harness connector for aerospace-ish applications, the whole concept of dsub shells and using it for external cables is largely an IT industry invention that happened few decades after introduction of the connector itself. Micro ribbon (ie. “Centronics”, “Telco connector” and what not) is actually meant for repeated imprecise insertions and has comparable pin density and electrical specification, but thickness of its shell is at the edge of what is practical for various EuroCard-derived backplane systems (which includes PC cases) and thus DSub won.
Re:DB-19: Resurrecting an Obsolete Connector (2016) by C1sc0cat on Thursday October 24, 2019 @12:42PM (#21346330)
Ah I see what you mean
Re:DB-19: Resurrecting an Obsolete Connector (2016) by ken on Thursday October 24, 2019 @05:12PM (#21349233)
It had two DB25 connectors. That's an old analog mixer from 2004. The Mackie webpage doesn't even list products that old.

Of course, their current digital mixers don't have any D-shell connectors.

Re:DB-19: Resurrecting an Obsolete Connector (2016) by scarecrowbob on Thursday October 24, 2019 @07:02PM (#21350070)
Well, it's still around, that's for sure...

https://apogeedigital.com/products/symphony-io/configuration...

I mean, I can't afford $5K for that, but it's there.

Re:DB-19: Resurrecting an Obsolete Connector (2016) by tigeba on Thursday October 24, 2019 @09:21PM (#21350909)
This is an extremely common and widely used standard for analog and digital connections for pro audio. I just wired in a bunch of DB25 gear last week. For low end / mid range digital stuff it is more common to see ADAT optical digital vs DB25