Re:US Constitution – A Git repo with history of edits
by shanecoin on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @04:10PM
(#21338451)
The best part of this repository is that the authors and the commit dates reflect the true date of the event:
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:US Constitution – A Git repo with history of edits
by Mathnerd314 on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @04:15PM
(#21338503)
Honestly it seems like one of the worst parts, that the dates are limited by UNIX timestamps and aren't flexible enough to store the dates from centuries ago.
Re:US Constitution – A Git repo with history of edits
by the8472 on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @04:19PM
(#21338544)
they do when you use signed 64bit timestamps (or 128bit ones if you need the nanos)
Re:US Constitution – A Git repo with history of edits
by Mathnerd314 on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @05:08PM
(#21339044)
Apparently it's technically possible in Git as of a year or two ago, with some conversion bugs probably still lurking, but Github/Gitlab still don't support it. And the frontend tools like "git commit" don't support it. The project in this answer is using git hash-object to create the commit from raw bytes. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/21787872/is-it-possible-...
Re:US Constitution – A Git repo with history of edits
by kzrdude on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @04:39PM
(#21338754)
Unfortunately git rejects dates before 1970, at least when I set them using GIT_AUTHOR_DATE
Re:US Constitution – A Git repo with history of edits
by pault on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @06:13PM
(#21339628)
This is especially troublesome when you need to cover up those 50 years of procrastination on a project.
Re:US Constitution – A Git repo with history of edits
by smitty1e on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @10:53PM
(#21341253)
You say 'procrastination' I say 'The means IS the end, yo!'.
Re:US Constitution – A Git repo with history of edits
by he_the_great on Sunday October 27, 2019 @11:37AM
(#21370363)
No the dates are wrong, and the conversation used is stupid.