I have absolutely failed to convince anybody that they don't need an SUV. Doesn't matter. They want an SUV. Not a hatchback of same practicality but better turning/braking; not a Minivan of comparable bulk and price but hugely increased practicality (for a large-family north-american suburb lifestyle; everything is relative:) - a large heavy SUV with tiny brakes is what they want.
(And when I say "They", that includes my wife and now we have one too :-< )
I have tried to convince with equation of "chance of being in accident multiplied by chance of dying in an accident", with the idea that you can work on either of the variables to decrease the total; and indicated that maaaybe in SUV you are safer if you crash, but with a smaller more nimble better visibility car you are less likely to crash. This makes no progress - most people's attitude is "When I crash", not "If I crash".
Small cars don’t necessarily have better visibility. I have far better visibility in my Q7 than I did in my Audi A3.
And a smaller car doesn’t do much to help against an 18 wheeler or UPS truck. If I am in a crash in a Civic, I am more likely to die than a crash in a Jeep Cherokee
Smaller cars are not safer, because physics.
An SUV built after 2012 (that’s when mandatory stability control arrived) is safer than a car. The idea that being nimble keeps you safer is silly. Most accidents don’t give you enough notice before they’re about to happen. Also, I would argue my turbo Q7 is far more nimble than the Prius.
The Hyundai Accent is the most dangerous car to be in, based on fatality rates. The Jeep Cherokee has zero fatalities from 2012-2015. https://www.forbes.com/sites/jimgorzelany/2017/07/06/deathtr...
and drivers
It's not just the mass of the vehicle too. Here in southern California it definitely seems like there's an arms race of headlight brightness where the victims are smaller/lower cars, especially those without dimming mirrors. I really wish the authorities (or maybe insurance) started looking into headlight brightness/angling.