First, why do I have to make the really strong argument? The default position is the status quo; if you think it should be changed, you have to make the really strong argument as to why it would be better. You have the burden of proof; the status quo does not.

But corporatism isn't the answer, on even a superficial look. Crony capitalism generates waste from those who fail because they are locked out. But corporatism is wasteful, too, of those who in an open system could have tried and succeeded, but in corporatism are locked out and know it, and therefore don't even bother to try.