News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A study finds that bosses can be useful but also sneaky by adrianmonk on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @11:15AM (#21335469)
I like the way you've broken this down, and I realize you're just giving examples, but your first third (service of the team) doesn't include any long-term development of employees. (Probably just because your purpose here isn't to make an exhaustive list, but it got me thinking about this.)

I mention this because I think one thing that separates mediocre managers from really good ones is that the good ones understand each employee's strengths and weaknesses and try to help them chart a course for success. That means finding their place on the team and it also means growth. It's to everyone's benefit if, 6 months or a year from now, that employee is a better employee. A manager is in a unique position to coach and mentor, and to create the conditions for growth and encourage it. A self-starter employee will do some of this on their own, but they usually need the manager to participate too by doing stuff like recognizing realistic opportunities for an employee to take on more responsibility and taking a chance by trusting them with it. A lot of managers don't seem to even attempt to do any of this or aren't even aware that it's a thing, and then their team languishes and stagnates and they wonder why they aren't getting anything out of their people.

Re:A study finds that bosses can be useful but also sneaky by ebiester on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @11:41AM (#21335759)
Certainly, long term development of employees is part of that third, and a significant one at that. But much of growth is subtle - it's about looking at projects and going, "Person A can get it done quickly but Person B would grow and appreciate the task, and Person C feels a bit of ownership over a part of it, and will grab due to an assertive personality if I let them sort it out themselves. So I'm going to have to massage a few egos here.) That doesn't take a lot of time but it is definitely emotional labor.

Emotional labor can be hard to quantify, and so outside of 1:1s and ad-hoc goal setting meetings and reviews, it's both important and hard to quantify in terms of time. Further, it's another task that can be a peer task - that is, it's something that technical leads can do for their teams and management can reassign the rest.

The original comment was talking about taking out most of management, so it's probably something they wouldn't consider as a key management priority that couldn't be done by developers.