Re:TechCrunch published Snap earnings before numbers went pu...
by Thorrez on Tuesday October 22, 2019 @11:39PM
(#21330834)
The tweet says:
>Yep, TC had the numbers early and published almost 10 min before numbers actually hit the wires.
It appears the official announcement was supposed to be at 4:10pm EDT[1]. The tweet was at 4:07pm EDT. It's likely the tweet was posted several minutes after the TechCrunch article. So that lines up with the TechCrunch article being ~10 minutes early. The author of the TechCrunch article tweeted it at 4:32pm EDT[2]. There is an archive.org snapshot from 4:02pm EDT in which it has a 404[3]. I'm guessing that snapshot was after it had been taken down, and before it had been put back up. Because if it was before it was ever posted, it raises the question of how did archive.org know which URL to snapshot?
>Yep, TC had the numbers early and published almost 10 min before numbers actually hit the wires.
It appears the official announcement was supposed to be at 4:10pm EDT[1]. The tweet was at 4:07pm EDT. It's likely the tweet was posted several minutes after the TechCrunch article. So that lines up with the TechCrunch article being ~10 minutes early. The author of the TechCrunch article tweeted it at 4:32pm EDT[2]. There is an archive.org snapshot from 4:02pm EDT in which it has a 404[3]. I'm guessing that snapshot was after it had been taken down, and before it had been put back up. Because if it was before it was ever posted, it raises the question of how did archive.org know which URL to snapshot?
[1] https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20191022006082/en/
[2] https://twitter.com/JoshConstine/status/1186742106175393792
[3] https://web.archive.org/web/20191022200231/https://techcrunc...