News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:TechCrunch published Snap earnings before numbers went pu... by wgerard on Tuesday October 22, 2019 @10:06PM (#21330388)
> Yes, the SEC definitely follows up on this

Yes, and they're quite adept at it even if you don't think you're leaving a trace. For example: https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2014-55

Re:TechCrunch published Snap earnings before numbers went pu... by Danieru on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @01:20AM (#21331335)
Interesting how the middleman got off without punishment. Shows how narrow insider trading can get, which speaks the the programmer tendency to assume law is code. Rather law is interpreted and in this case only two of the three parties fell under the SEC enforcement. That neither is going to jail is also notable, SEC can take money and burn a career but stealing from the market is lots safer than selling drugs.
Re:TechCrunch published Snap earnings before numbers went pu... by thaumasiotes on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @01:59AM (#21331527)
Well, for insider trading, it isn't prohibited by law. It's entirely precedent.
Re:TechCrunch published Snap earnings before numbers went pu... by leoedin on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @07:18AM (#21333399)
That account sounds like at least one of the 3 provided a detailed description of what happened. The SEC weren't listening into the initial conversations they had - presumably they got wind of the trading and then managed to get enough leverage on one of them to make them talk. If they didn't talk, I wonder what level of evidence the SEC would have.