Re:New York Times Eliminates Director of Information Securit...
by matt4077 on Tuesday October 22, 2019 @09:21PM
(#21330184)
The reasoning for eliminating the public editor was that today, social media does a far better job at it than anyone in-house ever could, especially considering the widespread view that it's impossible to independently criticise one's own organisation.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:New York Times Eliminates Director of Information Securit...
by will4274 on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @01:28AM
(#21331371)
Which is, of course, ridiculous. The public editor (or ombudsman at WaPo) served a crucial role in giving official "news" status and internal information about drawbacks in their own reporting - neither function which can be filled by randoms on social media.