AWS Customers Rack Up Hefty Bills for Moving Data

Re:AWS Customers Rack Up Hefty Bills for Moving Data by K0SM0S on Monday October 21, 2019 @07:07PM (#21318572)

I hear more and more cases of businesses moving parts off of the cloud, back on-premises. I think, in a wider perspective, it's going to play back and forth. The 2010's were 'forth' towards the cloud, the 2020's might see a peak back on-prems, etc.

It's generally a function of network cost versus infra cost, and so the 'equation' solves differently based on the longest tech cycles, from inception to maturity to skill pool to diminishing returns and then back again on some other mode — this really is a decade+ thing.

Some "always true" inherent advantages of one approach (e.g. availability for cloud, or resources for on-prems) would remain across cycles as permanent gains; disruption then occurs when some new approach (e.g. containerization) fundamentally upsets the order of costs.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AWS Customers Rack Up Hefty Bills for Moving Data by snark42 on Monday October 21, 2019 @07:22PM (#21318681)

> It's generally a function of network cost versus infra cost, and so the 'equation' solves differently based on the longest tech cycles,

It used to be OpEx was easy, CapEx was hard to get approved. As people took advantage and OpEx went through the roof people are getting alot more pushback on reducing OpEx.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AWS Customers Rack Up Hefty Bills for Moving Data by K0SM0S on Tuesday October 22, 2019 @06:34PM (#21329143)

Spoken like a true Chief Officer.

Pushing back on OpEx in favor of CapEx might be seen as a more long-term strategy too. Basically rent vs purchase, even for deprecating assets like infosys, as I think the current DevOps trend (scaling in pure software, virtualization, etc) makes it easier than ever to squeeze every last FLOP on-premises.

[ Parent | on HN ]