News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Why Did ArchLinux Embrace Systemd? (2016). Parent comment

Re:Why Did ArchLinux Embrace Systemd? (2016) by Redoubts on Monday October 21, 2019 @04:56PM (#21317250)
Binary logs seem great on macOS, why is this bad for Linux?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why Did ArchLinux Embrace Systemd? (2016) by qtplatypus on Monday October 21, 2019 @05:22PM (#21317545)
Because Linux and MacOS targets different roles.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why Did ArchLinux Embrace Systemd? (2016) by Redoubts on Monday October 21, 2019 @07:56PM (#21318923)
Could you elaborate more? My use case is very similar between the two, and I don't mean workstation operation.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why Did ArchLinux Embrace Systemd? (2016) by qtplatypus on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @12:21AM (#21331004)
I'm thinking that Linux is primarily a server OS and MacOS is primarily a workstation. And yes people do use Linux on the desktop and visa versa.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Why Did ArchLinux Embrace Systemd? (2016) by Redoubts on Monday October 28, 2019 @01:46PM (#21379480)
> I'm thinking that Linux is primarily a server OS and MacOS is primarily a workstation.

Good for you.

> And yes people do use Linux on the desktop

Good for them.

But the fact remains that this post still ignores why binary logs are bad for the server use case. They seem great for me in that role.

[ Parent | on HN ]