News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Did ArchLinux Embrace Systemd? (2016) by aidenn0 on Monday October 21, 2019 @03:10PM (#21316042)
Not OP, but I would consider SIGTERM as IPC, but SIGKILL as not really IPC (since the target can't respond to it).

Traditional RC does a SIGTERM to everything, and then waits a bit and then does a SIGKILL to everything. This means that if the SIGTERM failed to be handled properly, progress is still made.

Re:Why Did ArchLinux Embrace Systemd? (2016) by thayne on Tuesday October 22, 2019 @12:07AM (#21320293)
systemd does that too. The problem is that the default wait time is insanely long (I think it is something like 5 minutes). My biggest complaint with systemd is the same as my biggest complaint with tmux: many of the defualt configurations are very strange.
Re:Why Did ArchLinux Embrace Systemd? (2016) by aidenn0 on Wednesday October 23, 2019 @12:33PM (#21336294)
Yeah, default configuration of systemd-logind is to prevent network access. This means if you use e.g. NIS authentication weird things happen.

Weird as in 3 minutes after someone SSHd into my workstation, X11 restarted. Until I tracked it down to a default systemd configuration I thought I was going insane.

Beyond the default configuration, which is somewhat defensible as NIS is probably not a typical case, it really bothers me that if someone else's login process has issues, everybody's logins get killed.