Re:Elm 0.19.1
by savanaly on Monday October 21, 2019 @12:19PM
(#21314055)
Did you read the survivorship bias portion of the post? Since it is making points in support of the direction taken here and you didn't respond to them I assume not, but in particular it gives an interesting exasmple of how Elm evaluates feedback from language users (it collects data on the error messages they get automatically using elm/error-message-catalog).
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Elm 0.19.1
by Existenceblinks on Monday October 21, 2019 @08:26PM
(#21319115)
I did twice before my comment was made. I'm cool with nice error messages.