Oh, that's just because you are reading 'neurodiverse' literally. The usage here tells you that it's obviously a euphemism for a term that doesn't have the problem you describe.

The article never refers to a "neurodiverse person". It does refer to groups: neurodiverse workers, neurodiverse employees, neurodiverse staff, neurodiverse colleagues, and neurodiverse voices. But not "neurodiverse person."

Actually it is a thing - it the now accepted term for a wide range/spectrum of conditions Dyslexia Dyspraxia, ADD Aspersers.

So perhaps a better terrm would be 'neuroatypical person'?

True but its harder to say :-)