> This idea is laughable. Do you honestly believe just not telling the victims the material is out there will convince them the material isn't out there?

I'm not really agreeing or disagreeing with your viewpoints, but your logic here seems weird. In that particular case, nothing would ever convince them that people aren't looking at it, even if they weren't.

You can never really tell if someone is or isn't doing something on the internet, especially with the proliferation of strong encryption.