Re:NASA engineer's 'helical engine' may violate the laws of ...
by labawi on Sunday October 20, 2019 @03:06PM
(#21306312)
It slows you down :)
The vacuum part was an emphasis on requiring a counterpart to change momentum.
In an atmosphere you could flap your wings, or use electric fans, and argue what it means to ride a swing, but it would be besides the point, as in an atmosphere there is no need for propellant-less engines from the article.
The vacuum part was an emphasis on requiring a counterpart to change momentum.
In an atmosphere you could flap your wings, or use electric fans, and argue what it means to ride a swing, but it would be besides the point, as in an atmosphere there is no need for propellant-less engines from the article.