Re:Builders Ditch Nest After Google Ties Devices to Digital ...
by el_benhameen on Saturday October 19, 2019 @12:49AM
(#21296802)
I use Wyze cameras for baby monitors, home security, etc., and I’ve been pretty happy with them. They’re cheap enough that you can throw a camera at pretty much any idea. They are a cloud-based product so they come with all of the associated privacy concerns, but if you were using Nest then that’s maybe not a huge deal. Not affiliated with the company, just relatively pleased with the products.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Builders Ditch Nest After Google Ties Devices to Digital ...
by the_pwner224 on Saturday October 19, 2019 @03:12AM
(#21297273)
The Wyze cams are very cheap and you might be able to use them locally as normal network cameras without any internet connection.
A year or two ago I looked into this and there was a 'jailbreak' to load different firmware onto it, but I think it stopped being functional due to updates. However, I have heard things about an official offline firmware being released by Wyze which you may want to look into.
Re:Builders Ditch Nest After Google Ties Devices to Digital ...
by icelancer on Saturday October 19, 2019 @04:49PM
(#21300682)
Awesome, that'd be huge. Only issue with them are the SD cards being the canonical place to store footage... so if the criminal (or weather event) destroys the cameras.... not so useful.
Re:Builders Ditch Nest After Google Ties Devices to Digital ...
by icelancer on Saturday October 19, 2019 @01:41AM
(#21296963)
Same. I use their cameras and now their motion detectors. They are cheap and work well. Their IR filters jam regularly though on the cameras, giving everything a blindingly purple shade unless you just have IR/night mode on at all times. Small price to pay for the cost of the camera I guess.