Re:Mozilla’s 18-month effort to market without Facebook
by colanderman on Thursday October 17, 2019 @08:56AM
(#21281505)
No, tu quoque is when someone defends entity A's bad actions by saying that entity B also does bad things.
The GP is not trying to defend Facebook here. Their argument is that Mozilla is not acting fully ethically, by seemingly treating Google specially. Therefore tu quoque does not apply. (Moreover, the argument is logically sound.)
The GP is not trying to defend Facebook here. Their argument is that Mozilla is not acting fully ethically, by seemingly treating Google specially. Therefore tu quoque does not apply. (Moreover, the argument is logically sound.)