Algolia raises $110M for its search-as-a-service

Re:Algolia raises $110M for its search-as-a-service by rapind on Wednesday October 16, 2019 @09:16PM (#21278033)

Sounds like a good case for Algolia Professional Services! (If this exists?)

I remember pushing Google's search appliance for a large media company some 10 years ago or so (no benefit to myself though, which was pretty noob). It made sense at the time, and solved something for them better than they probably would have implemented it themselves in a good enough way. The most complicated part was setting up rules about what was public / private / internal etc.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Algolia raises $110M for its search-as-a-service by mlthoughts2018 on Thursday October 17, 2019 @06:42AM (#21280633)

Except this would be prohibitively expensive. The labor cost of those specialized employees as consultants would be huge.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Algolia raises $110M for its search-as-a-service by cglace on Thursday October 17, 2019 @09:06AM (#21281576)

So you are saying it’s too expensive to hire those specialists but you need those specialists to setup a working search solution? Is your stance that only companies that can afford a bespoke solution should implement search?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Algolia raises $110M for its search-as-a-service by mlthoughts2018 on Thursday October 17, 2019 @02:04PM (#21284752)

You do know that paying for these kinds of services from consultants is much more expensive than hiring in-house, right? Consulting is purchased either because you only need the specialization for a short time and can pay the mark up for the flexibility, or because you need some external virtue signalling of prestige or authority to overcome in-house political blockers. Consulting is absolutely not the cost-effective option for a specialization you’ll need frequently.

[ Parent | on HN ]