Re:Algolia raises $110M for its search-as-a-service
by faceshapeapp on Wednesday October 16, 2019 @07:31PM
(#21277249)
Simply sorting by date doesn't really seem to be that useful either.
For example, the poster below showed the following link for the "ml" query: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que....
If you look at the results, the first 2 results only matched part of the poster's username and many of the top results here are empty threads which are not that useful since HN is mostly for discussions.
To be clear, I'm not saying it's all bad, just pointing out that there are low hanging fruits which can improve results quite a bit.
Also, Algolia seems misspelled in your query which is why it fails when reordering by date: https://imgur.com/a/pO9fBWr, it works otherwise. Although, it says the date is 1 day old when it's just 2 hours old.
Re:Algolia raises $110M for its search-as-a-service
by sniperjzp on Wednesday October 16, 2019 @08:05PM
(#21277557)
️ oops, a typo in the query, but why they have query correction for popularity based, not date based?
Re:Algolia raises $110M for its search-as-a-service
by redox_ on Thursday October 17, 2019 @03:53PM
(#21285759)
Yes, when sorting by date it's currently configured to disable typo-tolerance. This is to avoid having an old (but approximative, like with typos) result BEFORE the correct ones.
Re:Algolia raises $110M for its search-as-a-service
by unityByFreedom on Wednesday October 16, 2019 @09:08PM
(#21277987)
Sort by date works fine. Your last search has a typo `agolia`.
Some people says it's popularity based, but if I change it to date based, it's broken? https://imgur.com/a/HGzL6fO