Re:US Law Enforcement Traces Bitcoin Transfers to Nab ‘Large...
by vkou on Wednesday October 16, 2019 @02:50PM
(#21273971)
> Also, if you solely receive and send bitcoin outside of an exchange, you can easily remain pseudo-anonymous in that anyone can see that wallet X has received Y bitcoins and send W bitcoins but without a person attached to the wallet, it's useless information.
If this thing were a big enough problem, the government could easily require you to provide a ledger of all the parties you've transacted with (Your wallet is doing book-keeping, how hard would it be for a legitimate user to enter a small memo for every transaction, anyways?)
Failure to provide a ledger, or for your ledger to fail to cross-correlate with that of your counterparty would, of course, imply that you're a criminal.
Unlike cash, bitcoin leaves a very obvious breadcrumb trail, that can, with a bit of legislature, be turned into an incredibly useful tool for LE.
Also, if you solely receive and send bitcoin outside of an exchange, you can easily remain pseudo-anonymous in that anyone can see that wallet X has received Y bitcoins and send W bitcoins but without a person attached to the wallet, it's useless information.
This is way crypto currencies are regulated at the edges, if fiet to crypto is watched just like any other bank/exchange, then criminal activity has a hard time getting money out. At the end of the day, it's difficult to buy 'real' things; food, clothing, housing with bitcoin.