News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Banning cars on SF’s Market Street, once a radical idea, ... by biswaroop on Tuesday October 15, 2019 @11:29PM (#21266802)
Taxis (including Uber+Lyft) are such incredibly bad drivers. They rarely signal turns, often fail to stop at signs, and make sudden unannounced stops inside bike lanes.
Re:Banning cars on SF’s Market Street, once a radical idea, ... by bradlys on Wednesday October 16, 2019 @01:37AM (#21267362)
It's really no different with most drivers... You just notice the taxis more because they are all one group that stand out.

I'm pretty critical of taxi drivers but they really aren't any worse than most drivers besides the random stopping without signalling at all. Which, no surprise, non-taxis do a lot too if you take enough notice. Taxis just do it more cause they stop more.

Re:Banning cars on SF’s Market Street, once a radical idea, ... by close04 on Wednesday October 16, 2019 @04:13AM (#21268146)
> It's really no different with most drivers...

It is because they drive all day and do this for a living so "cutting corners" (literally or figuratively) will save them... something. A private driver may not find any value in doing this regularly since they may drive 30-60 minutes per day. You are more likely to cut corners in your day job because you know it very well and you feel comfortable doing this, even if it's not safe.

Re:Banning cars on SF’s Market Street, once a radical idea, ... by benj111 on Wednesday October 16, 2019 @02:20AM (#21267596)
"because they are all one group that stand out"

Like BMW drivers?

Re:Banning cars on SF’s Market Street, once a radical idea, ... by danmaz74 on Wednesday October 16, 2019 @04:18AM (#21268186)
Not signalling turns is something that I really don't understand. It requires minimal effort, doesn't slow you down in any way, and significantly increases safety. It's something that should be enforced much more.
Re:Banning cars on SF’s Market Street, once a radical idea, ... by kd5bjo on Wednesday October 16, 2019 @05:16AM (#21268486)
There’s a significant fraction of drivers that interpret a turn signal as a sign that it’s ok to pass unsafely because the signalling driver is safety-conscious and will act to avoid a colission,
Re:Banning cars on SF’s Market Street, once a radical idea, ... by TheSpiceIsLife on Wednesday October 16, 2019 @07:07AM (#21269082)
I’ve heard the argument described like this:

Indicating I’d exactly that: indicating your intention to turn, which is useless information because it causes people to assume they know what you will do.

It’s not an entirely flawed argument.

Re:Banning cars on SF’s Market Street, once a radical idea, ... by bmn__ on Wednesday October 16, 2019 @06:54AM (#21268999)
These people are mentally unfit to take part in motorised traffic. Confiscate their driving licence and return it only when they undergo and pass a psychological examination.
Re:Banning cars on SF’s Market Street, once a radical idea, ... by informatimago on Saturday October 19, 2019 @02:34PM (#21299973)
It looks like Tesla AI doesn't take the signals into account, but only the car movements.