News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Blizzard employees strongly support punishing HK advocate, censorship – survey. Parent comment

Re:Blizzard employees strongly support punishing HK advocate... by tgsovlerkhgsel on Tuesday October 15, 2019 @09:37PM (#21266189)
> There is a rule against that

There is a vague and generic rule designed to let Blizzard slap people who make them look bad with penalties. Nothing like "no politics".

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Blizzard employees strongly support punishing HK advocate... by cjbprime on Tuesday October 15, 2019 @09:46PM (#21266239)
Fair enough, we could restate it, then: it would be generally unobjectionable to create and enforce a rule against disrupting tournament coverage with political speech.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Blizzard employees strongly support punishing HK advocate... by Fnoord on Wednesday October 16, 2019 @06:58AM (#21269027)
All speech is related to politics though. There is no such thing as "apolitical speech".

As for the survey, it shows also something else: company loyalty.

Also, they called it Activision Blizzard; not Blizzard. So they included Activision employees in the survey?

[ Parent | on HN ]