News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Blizzard employees strongly support punishing HK advocate... by wutbrodo on Tuesday October 15, 2019 @07:52PM (#21265447)
Blind requires verification with a work email.
Re:Blizzard employees strongly support punishing HK advocate... by taborj on Wednesday October 16, 2019 @10:08AM (#21270454)
Which then introduces some doubt that this is truly anonymous. In other words, if the respondents feel that there's a chance that their answers could be linked back to themselves as employees, they're probably more likely to toe the company line.
Re:Blizzard employees strongly support punishing HK advocate... by outworlder on Tuesday October 15, 2019 @08:35PM (#21265787)
> Blind requires verification with a work email.

Thankfully corporations are unable to control their own email addresses, right?

Re:Blizzard employees strongly support punishing HK advocate... by wutbrodo on Tuesday October 15, 2019 @09:00PM (#21265959)
Huh? Is your suggestion that these are not employees, but "people paid by a company to perform work for them"?

I suppose the FTE/contractor distinction is relevant here, but otherwise I don't get your point

Re:Blizzard employees strongly support punishing HK advocate... by icebraining on Tuesday October 15, 2019 @09:06PM (#21266003)
I think the suggestion is that they may not be individual employees stating their personal opinion, but accounts created by even just one employee (who can create multiple accounts) under company direction.