> Websites that publish child sexual exploitation material are getting heavily censored in the U.S. too. Think through what uncensorable implies.

To me, it implies that things you agree with and things you don't agree with cannot be censored. This seems like a prerequisite for a free society.

This is a bit meta and for that I apologise, but it's kind of interesting that the "drug addicts, paedophiles and terrorists" rhetoric seems to have lost almost all of its potency.

I found the reference to hate groups to be a much more effective argument, I think purely because everybody is so used to the kids/drugs/terror angle being overused and abused to chip away at liberties.

Surveillance-state dystopians take note.

Hate groups also seem to be much more abundant and visible. You don't see your local pedophilia lobby getting involved in politics.

That material could also be loaded on a flash drive and sent via the mail. I suppose the USPS and flash drives should be banned.