Re:$100k/year still might not be enough to buy a home
by g2ah5z on Tuesday October 15, 2019 @02:38PM
(#21262069)
You only need 3.5% down with an FHA loan. To put that in perspective, a $300,000 home would only require $10,500 down.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:$100k/year still might not be enough to buy a home
by itsbenweeks on Tuesday October 15, 2019 @03:07PM
(#21262418)
Sort of. You'd be left paying the difference of 3.5% to 20% (16.5% or $49,500) in a FHA Mortgage Insurance Premium (MIP). This means another loan that you need a 1.75% down payment for (making your downpayment ≈ 3.8% or $11,400) that adds another payment (≈ $400) in addition to the mortgage. MIPs last the entire life of the FHA loan, too.
Re:$100k/year still might not be enough to buy a home
by g2ah5z on Tuesday October 15, 2019 @04:09PM
(#21263139)
Yes, it's effectively a higher interest rate on the entire loan, but my point was that you don't need a massive amount of cash up front to close the deal.
Re:$100k/year still might not be enough to buy a home
by itsbenweeks on Tuesday October 15, 2019 @04:55PM
(#21263643)
And it's still a valid point. It's good to mention that a <20% down payment has caveats, too.
Re:$100k/year still might not be enough to buy a home
by sjg007 on Tuesday October 15, 2019 @02:42PM
(#21262132)
You can buy as low as 3% down and then there are the NACA loans and a slew of zero down programs.
Re:$100k/year still might not be enough to buy a home
by tbyehl on Tuesday October 15, 2019 @05:02PM
(#21263721)
Down payment is only a portion of the costs to buy a loan. My 3.5% down FHA mortgage on $309K purchase price cost me about $16K. My previous 5% down conventional on $103K was around $12K.
Moving in ain't free, either.