News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:NASA engineer's 'helical engine' may violate the laws of ... by phayes on Tuesday October 15, 2019 @01:39PM (#21261311)
"Oversimplified" is one way of putting it. I'd prefer to call it "simply incorrect". The manner in which the ring's rest mass is increased [decreased] is ignored[1]. If you don't ignore it, and apply conservation of (relativistic) angular momentum to the box-ring system, you'll see there's no reason to expect a net thrust at all.

[1] https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1141/1/...

There are no comments on this comment yet.