Re:.NET Core 3.0 Concludes the .NET Framework API Porting Pr...
by SideburnsOfDoom on Tuesday October 15, 2019 @10:24AM
(#21258687)
> No not dynamic
Ok, I see that structural typing is a third type system option.
But honestly, I don't want C# and .NET to contain every feature and paradigm ever created. It would be bloated and hard to use. Already there is significant legacy and different ways of doing the same thing, and it's likely to get even worse.
If the language that you ideally want is built around structurally typed free-floating functions, then it probably isn't C#. It probably exists, it's likely possible on the .NET platform, but it doesn't work and think like C#.
Ok, I see that structural typing is a third type system option.
But honestly, I don't want C# and .NET to contain every feature and paradigm ever created. It would be bloated and hard to use. Already there is significant legacy and different ways of doing the same thing, and it's likely to get even worse.
If the language that you ideally want is built around structurally typed free-floating functions, then it probably isn't C#. It probably exists, it's likely possible on the .NET platform, but it doesn't work and think like C#.