Re:NASA engineer's 'helical engine' may violate the laws of ...
by sgift on Tuesday October 15, 2019 @06:59AM
(#21257299)
Even things we think we know very well may be wrong, so having a certain budget for "fringe" subjects which may yield unexpected results is not a bad idea. At the same time it's probably a good idea to assume everything they report is a measurement/test setup error until further proof.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:NASA engineer's 'helical engine' may violate the laws of ...
by _0ffh on Tuesday October 15, 2019 @08:19AM
(#21257641)
Yup. As it is said "If a physicist says it's possible, then it's possible. If a physicist says it's impossible, then it's undecided."
Re:NASA engineer's 'helical engine' may violate the laws of ...
by lonelappde on Tuesday October 15, 2019 @08:59AM
(#21257881)
The actual saying is that everything that an elderly distinguishes scientist has an opinion about is probably possible.
It's a complicated way if saying almost everything is possible so don't believe old dogs who have given up on optimism. https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/arthur_c_clarke_100793