Re:Building China's Comac C919 airplane involved a lot of ha...
by TurkishPoptart on Monday October 14, 2019 @06:56PM
(#21253752)
Yeah, with all the effort CrowdStrike took to divide and preface each section of the doc, mark footnotes, and all the formatting junk....it's a very visually "noisy" document, and I really don't want to read it. Whatever happened to double-spacing? Simply godawful UX.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Building China's Comac C919 airplane involved a lot of ha...
by monocasa on Monday October 14, 2019 @07:11PM
(#21253869)
They're padding the document heavily is why. That's also why they have a whole section on "we spent time tracking down the Jiangsu Bureau of the MSS's buildings", with the conclusion that they're the buildings with "Jiangsu Bureau of the MSS" written in big letters on the side.
Re:Building China's Comac C919 airplane involved a lot of ha...
by TurkishPoptart on Tuesday October 15, 2019 @02:21PM
(#21261845)
Hah! And to think, their client could have paid $50k for this report that I and a few undergrads could hammer out in a Thursday evening after some yerba mate.