Re:How we failed, then succeeded, at migrating to TypeScript
by AriaMinaei on Sunday October 13, 2019 @03:32PM
(#21242391)
For me the scale tips heavily towards type safety and tooling of TypeScript. Then again, I wish we didn't have to choose.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:How we failed, then succeeded, at migrating to TypeScript
by davidjnelson on Sunday October 13, 2019 @03:56PM
(#21242533)
What would you say are the most useful features of coffeescript?
Re:How we failed, then succeeded, at migrating to TypeScript
by AriaMinaei on Sunday October 13, 2019 @04:13PM
(#21242652)
It's one and only useful feature compared to ES/TS is the syntax. Once you get used to it, which doesn't take long, you start to experience that in comparison to say ES6, you:
- Write/edit code faster - Read/understand code easier
People say this is subjective, but my experience with other developers has shown otherwise. I once asked a team of developers to "just go along with CoffeeScript for 2 weeks" instead of arguing its syntactic decisions (they were developers who had only used C-style syntax languages in the past like Java/C++/JavaScript). All of them ended up loving CoffeeScript and staying with it for years.
Mind you, TypeScript was a very different language back then. Once it started adding features like disjoint unions and the tooling matured, I made the switch.